| 03-27-2004, 07:49 PM | #16 |
Well, at least it wouldn't let people just anmously get away with demoting someone because they gave them a negative point even though they spammed. Plus someone could pretend to be someone else when they rate as well. Which in my opnion would create bad sitations. I mean, if someone gave a mod bad rep for no reason and said it was me i would take the blame - And likewise i could do that to someone else. |
| 03-27-2004, 10:14 PM | #17 |
I say that auto signature is the best policy... and what do the colors mean again? Green=good red=bad white= wtf? icbm1987 |
| 03-28-2004, 09:28 PM | #18 |
As far as a know People can't go and give bad reputation points to people twice in a row and have to get some good reputation before doing that again |
| 03-29-2004, 07:36 AM | #19 |
Perhaps they should make it so reputation points given or removed should be approved by authorities before actually done, and then, there's no pussy rule about being anonyme while doing so, you should see full names and all, so people know where it's coming from! ^_^ |
| 03-29-2004, 11:08 AM | #20 |
Ah, so thats why I have a white reputation point... |
| 03-29-2004, 06:07 PM | #21 |
Could a mod please tell me how i would go about finding who critisised me, this is not some vengance thing, but it appears that someone was impersonating 35263526. |
| 03-30-2004, 08:51 AM | #22 |
Anonymous rating aint no good. It's nice to know who is appreciative of your work when receiving positive reputation, and it's only fair to know who's against you. To get negative rep out of knowhere creates general distrust and may withhold people from posting their material and stuff. Its demotivating anyway, but when its anonymous, its like its the site itself is rating you that way. Its the reason I'm not going to post anything at that wc3sear.ch site unless there is shown appreciation for my posted stuff there by people with names. I mean, this is a community right, a social thing? Getting an idea from your place in such a community through some anonymous rating system is counter-productive, only creates distrust and confusion and stuff like that. That's what I think anyway. |
| 03-30-2004, 09:01 AM | #23 |
Beign anonymous is for cowards, and sissy men in Haircream-commercials! ;) |
| 03-30-2004, 11:23 PM | #24 |
another "What a total jackass" spam rate. Someone is making new accounts... Disable the system or fix it. I'm tired of my rep showing as like "3" being less than even Maverick is, but without the spam, very high... -_-;; Someone's definately abusing it, and someone's gonna get banned. This is becoming the dl section again.. |
| 03-31-2004, 02:58 AM | #25 |
First of all, I have recieved negative reputation and deserved it. But as kuruma said, if someone gets negative reputation, they would see who gave it too them, and give them negative reputation. |
| 03-31-2004, 03:32 AM | #26 | |
Quote:
The thing is... you must have accountability... just look at some of the rates that Kurama has gotten... poor guy, he's being abused. IF PEOPLE ARE NOT MATURE ENOUGH TO REFRAIN FROM ABUSING THE SYSTEM... THEN WE MUST HAVE ACCOUNTABILITY. icbm1987 |
| 03-31-2004, 04:19 AM | #27 |
kalar, if you didnt neg rate me, sorry, theres a lot of imersonators :-P ICBM- I wish all my posts were good-mannered ;) |
| 03-31-2004, 11:37 AM | #28 | |
Quote:
all that I have seen... and you are very helpful to the new members... both you and Jolly oven seem to know alot about the site. icbm1987 |
| 03-31-2004, 10:34 PM | #29 |
hey guys hear thee: reputation points deducted by Desperado: "fukcface triple spammer" lol, this guy was advertising in my own thread for campaign gathering |
| 03-31-2004, 10:45 PM | #30 |
i hate desperado, he goes in at the most random times and says something that may not be true, extremely unneccisary, and/or spam/obstructive... *goes to check desperado's reputation* |
