HomeUser Control Panel (unavailable in archive)ForumsTutorialsArt GalleryResourcesMaps

New Hosting Policy: Discussion and Complaints

11-04-2003, 04:15 PM#46
alpengeist36
ooh, funny.

why aren't you proud of this anymore?

although i do agree that fireaaro's treatment there was harsh, this is why BOTH sides need to abandon their stupid war
11-04-2003, 05:07 PM#47
Bolthan
Zurg> Stop whining man – Skull made a decision and you can jump up and down but he will not change it!

You ask why? He is the „chief“ here – so he can decide how things will work!

Another reason could be the following *sorry to say it* sometimes you were a „pain“ in the ***. In the cinematic forum you often commented how good your „movie“ will be and how „bad“ somebody else is – you often commented in a „rude“ way. Not in the way people in a „friendly“
community should act. I only hear you complain here – you want this and that. You act like a twelve year old child – you want two things but you can only have one. Hope you get that in your head!

You thought your project would be so important that Skull wouldn't kick you out!

You were wrong and so you must live with the consequences.

Somebody for sure will look at modforge and see how your project is going on but some
won't even notice that your project has vanished here!

You haven't checked two rules in life:

a) sometimes it is better to surrender, the moment of keeping
the white flag fly
b) If you don't make a decision somebody else will do it! (For sure
you won't like that decision.)*

* In this case – for sure – you didn't make a decision – you only complained and waited!

One thing more – from the PM Skull sent you, you had some time to finish your thing here ... not much but enough.
PM = private message - so you should have kept them private ...

I wish you good luck at your new site – I hope you got as much attention at modforge as at wc3campaigns!

Best wishes!
11-04-2003, 08:35 PM#48
Stereo
Not much to say..

Quote:
When you go around lending your mod to other sites with extra hosting, you leech off of our site and we can't have that happening.
Uh... its not leeching. It doesn't use your bandwidth to have them download it somewhere else.

Bolthan: how does this count as a victory for Skull? It's not hosted here anymore, thus anyone who wants to download it will go to mod*forge. IMO, he won, not wc3c.
11-04-2003, 08:47 PM#49
pixiesfanyo
Zurg was just bringing up a point...
anyyyway..he was already leaving when he posted this..so i figured he really didn't care what he put up
11-04-2003, 11:56 PM#50
MantisScreamer
Skull has constantly made bad desicions, he could wise up a bit IN MY OPINION. Warbringer and Zurg are smart by being hosted at other sites because they can still get a lot of publicity without fear of their project getting nuked. Wc3c's staff is kinda childish, and needs an adult to straighten things out for them. I'm not saying that all of wc3c is bad, some of the ppl are nice and stuff but a few just ruin it for everyone.
11-05-2003, 12:54 AM#51
Capn_Sniffies
Some Wc3 Campaigns moderators are sneezy. No offense, but I really think this site is a little on the conceited side.

It's a very big site and has helped me alot, but it's starting to lose my favor.

I hate to agree with MatisScreamer at CC:

"Those idiots will never learn to get skull deleted from the forums and unable to access the dam site. He is responsable for almost all of the **** wc3c has been through.

...Skull has a baaaad history"

Skull, you're not held in very high esteem over there.

"It's official, Skull is a stupid bastard that likes to play with himself while watching the discovery channel.

"Skull had sex with the turkey that I posted in the "Whoa" thread." SigmaMagnus

See for yourself =\
11-05-2003, 02:24 AM#52
Guest
That new rule would probably been discussed in the last meeting...which was the one I didnt attend to (otherwise it would never came to pass in the first place).

Well, anyways I'm also not quite fond of that policy rule, so Ill try to arrange a meeting with the admins and discuss that issue. Hopefully that rule will die down :mtk:

Anyways, expect something to be done about it soon.
11-05-2003, 02:35 AM#53
Warbringer87
Quote:
the forum equivalent of a nuclear bomb? anyway it's sad that just because of one incident most people on here think that modforge are a load of self-interested spammers, and no-one from camapigns ever did anything to modforge. if you want proof, gohere . i'm not suggesting that this was done with admin approval, and it was only due to an admin being fooled rather than an actual security flaw, but dorelian still mass-pruned the forums using another account, and there's no excuse for that.

i don't think my post makes much sense, but...

Uhmmm..I emant that mod forge was repeadatly hacked and that it was not their fault. They weren't being given fair chance.

EDIT: I assume that the link was somehow accidentally erased. Surely, the staff and admins have nothing to hide.
11-05-2003, 03:12 AM#54
decadence
Yes, they do not have anything to hide. That was a personal folder on a project FTP. Dragging it in was completely irrelevant. The link is still the same, anyhow. What do you mean "erased"? ¬_¬
11-05-2003, 03:41 AM#55
Warbringer87
The link was removed from my quote, and I put it back in there.

Thats why it says EDIT, in caps. Because I edited my post.


Quote:
That new rule would probably been discussed in the last meeting...which was the one I didnt attend to (otherwise it would never came to pass in the first place).

Well, anyways I'm also not quite fond of that policy rule, so Ill try to arrange a meeting with the admins and discuss that issue. Hopefully that rule will die down

Anyways, expect something to be done about it soon.

What does it matter now to CotD? The damage has been done, but I really do hope the rule i removed. Like I said it helps nobody.

Then again, if Skull was able to do this based solely on personal hatred, then really, what can the rest of the staff do? You all look powerless right now.

On a side note, good to see ya again cookie :P What's happenin?
11-05-2003, 04:43 AM#56
FireAarro
Quote:
Originally posted by Doldrum X
Some Wc3 Campaigns moderators are sneezy. No offense, but I really think this site is a little on the conceited side.

It's a very big site and has helped me alot, but it's starting to lose my favor.

I hate to agree with MatisScreamer at CC:

"Those idiots will never learn to get skull deleted from the forums and unable to access the dam site. He is responsable for almost all of the **** wc3c has been through.

...Skull has a baaaad history"

Skull, you're not held in very high esteem over there.

"It's official, Skull is a stupid bastard that likes to play with himself while watching the discovery channel.

"Skull had sex with the turkey that I posted in the "Whoa" thread." SigmaMagnus

See for yourself =\


Yeah, but it's really sad to see all these people saying that our site's staff are childish while saying that they wank off to the Discovery Channel.

Anyway, if you think their site admins are fairer than ours, they banned all their mods who got hacked, no questions asked. How is that said to be fair?

And it's not like `Skull has no backing. Most of the senior staff doesn't mind `Skull doing this, and Stoned actually approved of this new rule.
11-05-2003, 04:52 AM#57
Warbringer87
Quote:
Yeah, but it's really sad to see all these people saying that our site's staff are childish while saying that they wank off to the Discovery Channel.

All forums have immature, childish members. Skull however, is not just forumer, he is staff. Besdies, they said Skull wanks off to Discovery Channel, not that they do.


Quote:
Anyway, if you think their site admins are fairer than ours, they banned all their mods who got hacked, no questions asked. How is that said to be fair?

What site are you talking about here? If you speak of campaigncreations.org think before you speak.


Quote:
And it's not like `Skull has no backing. Most of the senior staff doesn't mind `Skull doing this, and Stoned actually approved of this new rule.

I would actually like to read Stoned's feelings about this rule, here. So if you don't mind, and if you have contact with him, get him here, yea?

Guess what, Hitler also had the backing of many Senior German Officials, and so did Stalin.

And what would happen if they didn't conform to Skull's ideas of whats right and whats wrong? *points to Zurg's situation*

And if Skull had the backing of the rest of the staff, then I guess everyone was okay with the threats Skull issued. So Zurg did good in not choosing this place.
11-05-2003, 05:53 AM#58
alpengeist36
Quote:
Originally posted by ragingdemon
Yes, they do not have anything to hide. That was a personal folder on a project FTP. Dragging it in was completely irrelevant. The link is still the same, anyhow. What do you mean "erased"? ¬_¬


of course not. no-one would possibly believe you've had it in your sig for several months and bragged about hacking modforge, then removed it as soon as someone points out what you were/are doing is wrong.

its strange, you're like quite a nice person most of the time, but as soon as the word modforge is mentioned...
11-05-2003, 06:06 AM#59
FireAarro
Quote:
Originally posted by Warbringer87
All forums have immature, childish members. Skull however, is not just forumer, he is staff. Besdies, they said Skull wanks off to Discovery Channel, not that they do.

You saying KryCheK and HollowMan and the rest of them aren't immature? Have you even been to Modforge?


Quote:
Originally posted by Warbringer87
What site are you talking about here? If you speak of campaigncreations.org think before you speak.

..ModForge.


Quote:
Originally posted by Warbringer87
I would actually like to read Stoned's feelings about this rule, here. So if you don't mind, and if you have contact with him, get him here, yea?

He posted it in the staff forums.. anyway, I thought I saw you on IRC several times.


Quote:
Originally posted by Warbringer87
Guess what, Hitler also had the backing of many Senior German Officials, and so did Stalin.

And what would happen if they didn't conform to Skull's ideas of whats right and whats wrong? *points to Zurg's situation*

Zurg was staff?


Quote:
Originally posted by Warbringer87
And if Skull had the backing of the rest of the staff, then I guess everyone was okay with the threats Skull issued. So Zurg did good in not choosing this place.


kthxbai
11-05-2003, 08:55 AM#60
decadence
Quote:
Originally posted by alpengeist36
of course not. no-one would possibly believe you've had it in your sig for several months and bragged about hacking modforge, then removed it as soon as someone points out what you were/are doing is wrong.

its strange, you're like quite a nice person most of the time, but as soon as the word modforge is mentioned...


Whenever did I "brag" about hacking modforge? ¬_¬. Someone just got hold of the passes and mass pruned. When is that considered hacking?

I didn't remove it. I merely had the tremendous urge to make a cool barbie fansite on your behalf. The page is still up, just not there. You were bringing an outside issue into Wc3C context. The admins didn't have anything to do with any of the so-called "hacking". The staff at modforge are so incompetent they don't even KNOW who hit them, so they just conveniently point the accusing finger at `Skull and whoever else they can.

Whatever you might think, all that has happened to modforge in the past months were not accepted or condoned by the Wc3C staff. They were planned and carried out by totally independent groups. Not Wc3C. Hollowman just needs something to blame for his incredible incompetency