| 04-06-2004, 12:44 AM | #76 |
what good will that do? are you going to punish people because the give bad rates? |
| 04-06-2004, 12:50 AM | #77 |
' near quote' by [name edited out, check it out in the thread] inappropriate comments or misconduct (ps. skinhead has a short temper and is due to be banned at any moment... i on the other hand, when about to be banned stay below the crowd till they forget i even exist.... uh oh... *runs off*) |
| 04-06-2004, 12:52 AM | #78 |
oh well you still got nothing on me(prove something, go ahead), besides if your witch hunting maverick and halcyon we all know who they are.....*cough*goongoon16 and perethor*cough* |
| 04-06-2004, 12:56 AM | #79 |
ill prove u have a bad temper right here... ur last post, the post b4 that... usually someone (referring to forumner) has to drop their act quick and get it together... for there may be no second chance (lucky for me... i think i have had 2, but nothing THAT serious...) your suppose to let it cool and not fight and/or complain (cept for the fact of CAL... but that was a guild based on forumners, not one person) |
| 04-06-2004, 01:02 AM | #80 |
wtf? ive been ****ing trolled the minute i started reposting here, wtf you expect me to lay low for? one of my first posts i was called a maverick spammer by that kuramarose guy. **** that, bad temper or whatever, i have done nothing bannable except making newbies that joined in september look like jerks. banning me will only make people like kuramarose think their opinion counts in this community, but honestly it doesnt. |
| 04-06-2004, 01:12 AM | #81 |
END THIS DISCUSSION NOW. a mod should close this... it has become a flamefest. Both of you should stop whining and get back to making stuff for the community. icbm1987 as of now... this thread is CLOSED |
| 04-06-2004, 01:14 AM | #82 |
mind if I post before its locked? I think Halcyon desirves to stay, since he learned his lesson. People dont see my side on Halcyon, I only wanted him to be temp banned for about a week, so that he'd learn his lesson. The admins chose to make it permanent. |
| 04-06-2004, 01:16 AM | #83 | |
Quote:
mod wannabe ^_^ but i agree...the thread has turned into a total flame war... |
| 04-06-2004, 01:21 AM | #84 |
skinhead is defined as: a person (a youth), with shaven or close-cropped hair worn as a symbol of anarchy, racism, or non-conformity. just to help this conversation! ;) |
| 04-06-2004, 01:30 AM | #85 |
well as ive already said its got more to do with skinning(textures) at polycount, and even so, the first skinheads were black people living in london who were attacked by the police. |
| 04-06-2004, 01:36 AM | #86 |
a bigger one from urbandictionary.com: A fashihion look that begun in 1969. in England, describing the look of the working class. Short hair is easy to wash, jeans are firm, don't rip easily and wash up easily, boots with caps keep feet safe. Later, laces come in with skins coming to football games (different colour of the laces showed which club they supported). In the '70. , the look and movement was hijacked by Brittish Nationalist Front, so today we have youth who harvested some sick ideas (nazi and white supremacy ideas). Today there are more "kinds" of skins: the traditional (working-class), the boneheads (nazi & WP), S.H.A.R.P.s (anti-nazi league), gay skinhead scene... In it's soul, skinhead movement started as a non-political fashion style of working class youth in England who listened to ska & reagge (later punk & oi!) and drove scooters. ------------------------------- his name still could mean it in a racist way. Infact, his posts all remind me of an American Lawyer, since he lies, bends peoples wording, is quick to judge, and the world would be better without them. ;) Well, just ignore him. You notice he is just a troller, since hes sucessfully pissed off next-to every member, and every thread hes posted in has turned to a flame war. To relate this to the topic, Skinhead is a perfect example of a reputation-system abuser. -edit- posted this before I saw your last post. Keep like that and you're OK on my books. You dont need to flame to get your point across. |
| 04-06-2004, 01:42 AM | #87 | |
Quote:
ermm... i have gone to help the community while i was here... so dont be accusing ppl of things u shant accuse ppl of! im OFFFFF |
| 04-06-2004, 01:52 AM | #88 | |
Quote:
|
| 04-06-2004, 01:56 AM | #89 |
correction: the last two posts are your only posts that arent flames/trolling posts... |
| 04-06-2004, 02:04 AM | #90 |
ive been asking you to prove it ever since you started saying flamer, more of your empty allegations |
