| 09-02-2008, 05:22 AM | #1 |
Is it true that when you start up multiple zero seconds timers their expiration times can be in different order than the one you used to start them up? I've been trying to reproduce this by using a big loop from i=0 to 100, and in every step I start a timer, attach the i and start it with 0 seconds time out, then during expiration, make the timer show a text message with the attached value. But it doesn't seem to ever be showing the numbers in a different order. How do you reproduce this claim? |
| 09-02-2008, 09:04 AM | #2 |
There is only one way to ruin timers - waits. Code:
function Overload takes nothing returns nothing
loop
exitwhen BREAK //some external value you can change ever inside lag
call ExecuteFunc("Overload")
call Sleep(0.)
endloop
endfunction |
| 09-02-2008, 07:29 PM | #3 |
wasn't able to reproduce the claim, even when using a random order of timers. |