| 03-23-2009, 07:53 AM | #1 |
After further inspection, I don't think anybody could benefit from this at all - deleted. |
| 03-23-2009, 08:04 AM | #2 |
Wouldn't that result in ultramegagigahuge arrays? EDIT: My bad, misread. I obviously don't know much about texttags... |
| 03-23-2009, 08:46 AM | #3 |
there is nothing wrong with it, but it is too simple to be needed as a script. it demonstrates a method. |
| 03-23-2009, 08:52 AM | #4 | |
Quote:
That's why I didn't bother putting it in the submissions section. If anybody needs it they should be able to find it by doing a search for "TextTags". |
| 03-23-2009, 01:25 PM | #5 | |
Quote:
|
| 03-23-2009, 02:01 PM | #6 |
Who would want to store a struct in a texttag? |
| 03-23-2009, 03:37 PM | #7 |
As Vestras said, there's no use for this, the only native that returns a textag is CreateTextTag, so you are never in a position where you'd need to attach data to a texttag for later use; if you use it later, you had to have goten it from a varable or an array, so you can just store the data in a parallel variable/array. |
| 03-23-2009, 08:01 PM | #8 | |
Quote:
I agree, its semi-useless, but in refute the only native that returns a timer is CreateTimer, etc. Say for instance you were wanting to store the elapsed time (current age) of a text-tag. Or maybe you want to know whether or not the text-tag is visible. You would probably have to store these values -to- the text-tag. It really doesn't matter though, just delete the thread if you like. I just thought I'd post it up to see what people said. |
| 03-23-2009, 08:24 PM | #9 |
GetExpiredTimer ... |
| 03-23-2009, 08:30 PM | #10 |
Point taken. |
