what are the adventages/disadventages of zepir's W3ZEdit Beta8 protection&weaaddar's?

10-09-2002, 10:38 AM	#1
Phil_123	the subject is the question...

10-09-2002, 03:34 PM	#2
SuperIKI	not again... :( This is how those debates look like: http://www.wc3campaigns.com/forums/s...&threadid=4650

10-09-2002, 07:04 PM	#3
weaaddar	Zepirs= Gain of size harder (to impossible) to break. Mine=Slight Loss of size easier to break

10-09-2002, 10:38 PM

zepir

Quote:

Originally posted by weaaddar
Zepirs= Gain of size harder (to impossible) to break.
Mine=Slight Loss of size easier to break

Agreed.
W3Z=
-increase map size (bytes) a little (like 10kb to 80kb)
-really harder to crack
-watermark is the ultimate thing that (almost) can't be removed from a file (even if you can edit it) so the original author name, in case of stealing can be checked

Weaaddar=
-easy to use
-reduce map size a little
-not really hard to get arround if you know the trick

10-10-2002, 04:14 PM	#5
Guest	Nice to see you two finally agreed on something :D .

10-10-2002, 07:17 PM	#6
weaaddar	Oh we always knew that mine was weaker :) It was basically the easiest encryption that I could throw together after UF told me of how he protected a map and shows all my "ability" at VB.