| 04-15-2004, 02:32 AM | #1 |
I was curious to see what the fellow map makers here at wc3c use to enhance their WE, I use UMSWE, but what do you guys use? |
| 04-15-2004, 05:17 AM | #2 |
In my experience the things that would have drawn me to use WEU (like editing tilesets) added to much size to my map to make ti worthwhile. Adding 3 exra tiles to my 200kb map jumped it up to 500kb :< . UMSWEs always been y favoruite, even though it has a habit of screwing up maps every patch or so, but that cant be helped. |
| 04-15-2004, 05:32 AM | #3 |
I prefer the standard WE. I haven't used an enhancer since the release of TFT. I have yet to be disappointed. |
| 04-15-2004, 06:56 AM | #4 | |
Quote:
Thats kinda impressive if you think of the really good maps you have donr... I prefer UMSWE if I use a enhancer. |
| 04-15-2004, 07:49 AM | #5 |
I agree with Panto. So far, there was nothing I couldn't do with the regular WE. |
| 04-17-2004, 05:45 PM | #6 |
Regular WE, with minor adjustments such as making the editor load a separate AbilityData.slk or some other file. Before TFT, UMSWE all the way, but now it is hardly necessary. Conversions from patch version to patch version are a pain with UMSWE, with the standard WE, there is no frustration... |
| 04-18-2004, 05:01 AM | #7 |
I'm the same as Panto. |
| 04-22-2004, 06:52 PM | #8 |
Yeah. me too. I think that those enhanced editors just are slower and.. well, unecessary :P |
| 04-22-2004, 07:53 PM | #9 |
Original WE rules.. :P Maybe because I never tried the others, but its because I think like this: Why use something blizzard didnt make for us to use..! |
