| 03-17-2005, 01:30 AM | #2 |
worm your not a fan of anything but realism like the real realism but i agree on one thing profile views are boring wheres marco when you need him? but anyways wont those spikes hurt the mounter? |
| 03-17-2005, 01:41 AM | #3 |
Guest | It's a concept not an actual drawing thus the profile view. And yes those spikes would most likely hurt him (or her) when he walks I'll change that. |
| 03-17-2005, 02:06 AM | #4 |
man that thing could trample someone to death in one stomp |
| 03-17-2005, 11:21 AM | #5 |
well i wouldnt call it a mount, id call it a BEAST because... well it doesnt seem that you can mount something like that... i dont mind profile views, or defined muscles... im just not talentted enough to know that its wrong. flames what are you talking about? dunno... but awesome concept, i should try to draw stuff like that in class... -pshycopathic flames |
| 03-17-2005, 06:59 PM | #6 |
Very interesting, but too terrestrial at the moment, I think. It's a good design, though the head is somewhat small for my taste. To make it more aquatic, I would try to go for a half-hoof-half-fin look with the feet, and an overload of scales. I'd imagine a naga mounting by wraping its tail around the midsection, so you might want a long-bodied creature, as well. "Mounting scales" could be interesting, as well - large, overlapping scales along the should the naga can grip to balance him/herself. |
| 03-18-2005, 02:13 AM | #7 |
Guest | Yes that idea about the naga wrapping its taila round the mount is what I was thinking of. And I agree with the head being to small but I didn't want to mess the picture up. I tried to do a combo "half-fin-half-hoof" but it didn't work out well I should have another concept for this guy by tomarrow. |
