Lightning Attack + Moon Glaive

Just wondering how these two abilities would combine. In ToB, Red Death has a lightning attack skill for the FoD lightning and it bounces to other units.. So I assume it's Lightning Attack + Moon Glaive. On to the point..

One thing I don't get is how Moon Glaive works. Will it mimic the attack of the unit or not. How well will it work if combined with Lightning Attack?

I don't have access to WE right now, but I'm hoping to get an answer.

I think it is the
"Weapon Type - Missile (Bounce)" That causes the huntress to bounce.

Wow, you have got to be shitting me.
Ever heard of an orb effect?
Apparently not.

It's based on the orb of lightning (new) ability.
You make a custom chain lightning ability using the red lightning effect from FoD and the FoD special effect on hit, then have the orb effect cast that chain lightning 100% of the time it strikes with an attack.
Voillah, now everytime the Red Death attacks, it fires a red chain lightning.
Done.

It has NOTHING to do with lightning attack and/or attack bouncing.

Except that orb abilities don't work on auto-acquired attacks. I think Red Death does use a bouncing attack.

What do you mean they don't work on auto-acquired attacks? I've never used orb abilities personally, but that seems odd to me. Perhaps I just don't know what you mean by "auto-acquired."

You could intercept when a unit auto-acquires and then issue the attack order to the unit.
For something like a ward that doesn't move, that would work sufficiently.

Issueing an order with triggers wont cause the orb to register attacks, the only way to do it is by the player actually ordering.

Man, orb effects really suck.

I ran into that problem with auto-acquiring and orbs, and posted about it in this thread, if you want more info.

All Red Death does is reissue a "smart" order on the autoacquired unit.

Wow, Kaz is here... this is awkward.

I thought that Moon Glaive was just an innate ability to signify an upgrade...

Thank you for that insight, because we totaly didn't establish that in the first reply already...